- [en]
- [de]
Details for: Expert Patients
Country | Spain |
Projectnumber | ES-12 |
Projectname | Expert Patients |
Projectname (nationale language) | Paciente Experto |
Organisation |
|
Type of organisation | private non-profit |
Start | 2006/01/01 |
End | on-going |
Relevance of the model | Evidence-based, established model on health promotion for older people |
Targetgroups |
|
Setting |
|
Funded by |
|
Region | Murcia |
Short summary | Aimed at people with chronic diseases, the program aims, through teaching and self-help groups, to empower people with such diseases in self management of their own health, to provide guidance for care-givers and improve the well being of both of them. |
Main objectives |
|
Main activities |
|
Evaluation | yes |
Description of evaluation | Previous evaluation in the US and the UK suggests the effectiveness of the model. |
Main results |
|
Promoting mental health |
|
Social participation and inclusion |
|
Lifestyle |
|
Inclusioncriteria More information on inclusion criteria | |
3. Multi-faceted, holistic | WHO multi-faceted approach of health and health promotion and intervention. |
4. Sustainability | |
6. Model involves visible and invisible target groups | The project looks to involve invisible groups in its interventions. |
7. Diversity | |
8. Geographical and physical accessibility | Due to the chronic conditions of the participants, the places for teaching are highly accesible. |
9. Well-grounded theoretical approach | Due to the chronic conditions of the participants, the places for teaching are highly accesible.Stanford University developed this programme and has enhanced the theoretical approach over a number of years. |
11. Cost effectiveness | High effectiveness with low investment. Only a venue and two teachers are required for each course. |
12. Empowerment | The projects shows effectiveness in the improvements of self-management of health and daily living |
13. Transferability | Ongoing in several countries |
14. Consumer satisfaction | Personal feedback show high consumer satisfaction, as well as that suggested by the evaluation. |