database: models of health promotion for older people
Details for: Health Promotion for Informal Carers
| Country | Austria |
| Project-number | AT-47 |
| Name of model | Health Promotion for Informal Carers |
| Name in national language | Gesundheitsförderung für pflegende Angehörige |
| Link to model | http://www.hauskrankenpflege.at |
| Organisation |
|
| Link to organisation | http://www.roteskreuz.at |
| Type of organisation | public non-profit |
| Project manager | Mag. Monika Wild |
| Start | 2000-09-01 |
| End | 2002-07-31 |
| Relevance of the model | Evidence-based, established model on health promotion for older people |
| Target groups |
|
| Age of target groups |
|
| Setting |
|
| Funded by |
|
| Partner institutions | |
| City |
|
| Region |
|
| Short summary | The project consist of 2 core phases. In the 1stphase consulters (not necessarily old aged) were trained in a new developed concept (interdisciplinary & in-service training, 160 hours). In total, 42 people were trained (39 completed positively). In the 2nd phase the consulters operated in 24 Austrian regions as health promotion consultants for informal carers. The offer was free of charge but restricted to maximal 4 consultations per person (incl. group consultations). |
| Main objectives |
|
| Main activities |
|
| Evaluation | yes |
| Description of evaluation | The evaluation consisted of two phases. Firstly the evaluation of the training activities and secondly, the evaluation of the implementation phase (counselling activities). |
| Main results |
|
| Contact name | Mag. Monika Wild |
| Contact email | wild@roteskreuz.at |
| Contact telephone | +43-1-58900-121 |
| Contact fax | - |
| Publications | (05.11.2007) |
| Promoting mental health |
|
| Empowerment | yes |
| Social participation and inclusion |
|
| Inclusion criteria More information on inclusion criteria |
|
| 2. Evaluation | The scientific evaluation consisted of evaluations of the two project phases: the training of the consultants and the implementation (consultations of informal carers). The evaluation report follows this evaluation outline. Different evaluation instruments were established. |
| 3. Multi-faceted, holistic | |
| 4. Sustainability | Very helpful for the project's success was the organisational support of the project and the engagement of the especially trained people from a broad range of different professions. Hence, it was also possible to enlarge the number of consultants in the districts: in the beginning as people for public relations but in the end as consultants too. |
| 5. Voice of older people | |
| 6. Model involves visible and invisible target groups | |
| 7. Diversity | |
| 8. Geographical and physical accessibility | A strength and a success criteria of the project was that the consultation services for the informal carers were possible in very different settings and with different means. Health promotion and protection consultations for informal carers were held directly via telephone or face-to-face (individually or in groups) or indirectly in form of public talks or in a self-help group setting. The most “popular” were the individual and family consultations directly in the homes of informal carers. |
| 10. Gender sensitivity | |
| 12. Empowerment | |
| 13. Transferability | |
| 15. Public recognition award | |
| 16. Innovative strategy | |
